Holmes v. Merck & Co Inc et al
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL HOLMES
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Case Number: 2:2019cv20197
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: HARVEY BARTLE
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by NATHANIEL HOLMES. All Defendants. (ENOCHS, JOHN)
June 5, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO)
June 4, 2019 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Louisiana Western; Case Number 2:19-cv-00643. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FOR MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER CTO # 33, directing transfer to Eastern District of Pennsylvania, In Re: Zostavax (Zoster Vaccine Live) Products Liability Litigation, MDL # 2484. Record electronically transmitted to receiving court. Case Terminated. All future pleadings should be filed with the newly assigned court. (crt,Whidden, C) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 6/4/2019.]
May 30, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE received via email from Clerk of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transmitting Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-33) in MDL No.2848, IN RE: Zostavax (Zoster Vaccine Live) Products Liability Litigation advising case shall be transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania upon request of the record. (crt,Whidden, C) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 6/4/2019.]
May 20, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Merck & Co Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (crt,Dauterive, C) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 6/4/2019.]
May 18, 2019 CASE Assigned to Unassigned District Judge and Magistrate Judge Kathleen Kay. (crt,Dauterive, C) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 6/4/2019.]
May 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merck & Co Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3952374) filed by Nathaniel Holmes. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Richard Lee Root added to party Nathaniel Holmes(pty:pla))(aty,Root, Richard) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 6/4/2019.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holmes v. Merck & Co Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
Represented By: DINO S. SANGIAMO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERCK & CO INC
Represented By: DINO S. SANGIAMO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL HOLMES
Represented By: RICHARD LEE ROOT
Represented By: BETSY J. BARNES
Represented By: Lauren E. Godshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?