RIVERS v. FRAVEL et al
RASHEEN RIVERS |
NATALIE FRAVEL, CURLEY, PA STATE PROBATION AND PAROLE RECORDS DEPARTMENT STAFF AGENT CULEY, ANNE M COOGAN, DAGGER and GEO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT |
2:2020cv00071 |
January 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GERALD J PAPPERT |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. RIVERS' COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, ETC. RIVERS' MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC. 3) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 2/24/20. 2/25/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO RIVERS.(rf, ) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 2/24/20. 2/25/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO RIVERS.(rf, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (md) |
Filing 3 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY filed by RASHEEN RIVERS. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED*(rf, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANNE M COOGAN, CURLEY, DAGGER, NATALIE FRAVEL, GEO MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, PA STATE PROBATION AND PAROLE RECORDS DEPARTMENT STAFF AGENT CULEY, filed by RASHEEN RIVERS. *IFP PENDING* *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED*(rf, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by RASHEEN RIVERS. *NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED*(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.