ZUHR TR et al v. BENHOUMMAD et al
REGINALD CUPID NOBLE TR and NAJA THURBAH ZUHR TR |
JANE DOE, ADULT DETENTION CENTER, JOHN DOE, KAMAL BENHOUMMAD, THOMAS MOOREHEAD, SHERIFF MIKE CHAPMAN, DEPUTY SHERIFF DORIAN A. LAMBERT, PHYLLIS J. RANDALL, BUTA BIBERAJ and PAUL WHITE |
AWOOTA JURIST CONSUL |
2:2020cv00955 |
February 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
Other Statutes: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. Mailed to pro se plffs on 2/24/20. (kw, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION FOR EMERGENCY HEARING IN JUDGE CHAMBERS, FILED BY AWOOTA JURIST CONSUL.(kw, ) "NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED" |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ADULT DETENTION CENTER, KAMAL BENHOUMMAD, BUTA BIBERAJ, MIKE CHAPMAN, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, DORIAN A. LAMBERT, THOMAS MOOREHEAD, PHYLLIS J. RANDALL, PAUL WHITE (IFP PENDING), filed by PRO SE PLFFS REGINALD CUPID NOBLE TR, NAJA THURBAH ZUHR TR.(kw, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/24/2020: #1 Civil Cover Sheets) (kw, ). "NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED" |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, FILED BY PRO SE PLFF REGINALD CUPID NOBLE TR.(kw, ) "NO ENVELOPE ATTACHED" |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by PLFFS REGINALD CUPID NOBLE TR, NAJA THURBAH ZUHR TR. (kw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.