EMRIT v. DEVOS et al
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT |
| SECRETARY BETSY DEVOS, ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, NELNET, DEFAULT RESOLUTION GROUP and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION |
| 2:2020cv00990 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Original record transferred to the MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA via interdistrict transfer system. (lvj, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER FORTHWITH THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. THE MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS SHALL BE LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF THE TRANSFEREE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 3/6/20. 3/6/20 ENTERED & COPY MAILED TO EMRIT.(fdc, )
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (amas) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, DEFAULT RESOLUTION GROUP, BETSY DEVOS, NELNET, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, filed by RONALD SATISH EMRIT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by RONALD SATISH EMRIT.(amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
