O'NEILL v. SAUL
| ROBERT JOSEPH O'NEILL, JR. |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 2:2020cv01125 |
| February 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| DAVID R STRAWBRIDGE |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons returned by PLFF ROBERT JOSEPH O'NEILL, JR., re: Thomas Sutton served summons and complaint upon DEFT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and U.S. Attorney General by certified mail, return receipt requested. "No green card attached." (kw, ) |
| Filing 5 Social Security Magistrate Consent by ROBERT JOSEPH O'NEILL, JR.. (SUTTON, THOMAS) |
| Filing 4 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney, Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (kw, ) |
| Filing 3 Procedural Order 3/2/20 Entered and copies mailed and e-mailed. (jl, ) |
| Filing 2 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(jl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE212116.), filed by ROBERT JOSEPH O'NEILL, JR. (Attachments: #1 CASE FORMS)(jl, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 3/2/2020) (jl, ). |
| 3 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: 2 TO THOMAS SUTTON; 1 TO U.S. ATTORNEY on 3/2/20 (jl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
