PILTZ v. ADP, LLC
JOHN PILTZ |
ADP, LLC and AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING |
2:2020cv01376 |
March 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
Civil Rights: Employment |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing:PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL TELEPHONE CONFERENCE SET FOR 6/2/2020 11:00 AM BEFORE HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF WILL INITIATE THE TELEPHONE CONFERENCE AND WHEN ALL COUNSEL ARE ON THE LINE, CALL CHAMBERS AT 267-299-7520. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(lds, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by ADP, LLC.(MICHAEL, CHRISTINA) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT SHALL HAVE AN EXTENSION OF TIME THROUGH 5/1/20 TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE PLEAD IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/2/20. 4/2/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOHN PILTZ re: David Torres served Summons and Complaint upon ADP, LLC by Personal. ADP, LLC served on 3/17/2020, answer due 4/7/2020. (BERGER, PHILLIP) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by JOHN PILTZ. (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADP, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE212826.), filed by JOHN PILTZ.(bw, ) |
1 Summons Issued as to ADP, LLC. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 3/12/2020 (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.