BOWMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ANTHONY BOWMAN |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3 |
2:2020cv01803 |
April 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PAUL S DIAMOND |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JOHN P. GONZALES on behalf of PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service(GONZALES, JOHN) |
Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES. EMAILED To: COUNSEL on 4/10/20 (jaa, ) Modified on 4/10/2020 (jaa, ). |
Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE- CAPTIONED CASE, WHICH IS RELATED TO CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-1471, SHALL BE PLACED IN SUSPENSE AND MARKED AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 4/9/20. 4/9/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by MATTHEW K. HUBBARD on behalf of CITY OF PHILADELPHIA with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service(HUBBARD, MATTHEW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14220907.), filed by ANTHONY BOWMAN.(PILEGGI, MICHAEL) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ANTHONY BOWMAN. (tjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.