Robles v. Warden/Superintendent of Federal Detention Center-Philadelphia
Petitioner: Liza Robles
Respondent: Warden/Superintendent of Federal Detention Center-Philadelphia
Case Number: 2:2020cv02221
Filed: May 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: EDWARD G SMITH
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2020 Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 3:20-cv-00767. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
May 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Based on the courts memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:(1) The defendant Liza Robless Motion for Immediate Release to Home Confinement, (Doc. 338), is construed as an emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241.(2) The clerk of court is directed to docket Robless Doc. 338 motion as a 2241 habeas petition and to assign it a separate civil number. Due to the immediate request for relief sought, the clerk of court is directed forgo the thirty-day administrative order requiring Robles to pay the filing fee for a habeas petition, as that can be addressed in the proper jurisdictional court.(3) The clerk of court is then directed to forthwith transfer Robless habeas petition to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.(4) To the extent Robless Doc. 338 motion can be construed a motion for compassionate release, it is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction since she has failed to comply with 3582(c)(1)(A)s exhaustion requirement.(5) To the extent Robless Doc. 338 motion can be alternatively construed as a motion for immediate release to home confinement under the CARES Act, it is DISMISSED since the court lacks authority to grant such relief under the Act.(6) Robless letter motion to the court seeking the appointment of counsel with respect to her motion, (Doc. 338 at 17), is DENIED without prejudice.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 05/08/2020. (lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/12/2020.]
May 8, 2020 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 05/08/2020. (lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/12/2020.]
May 8, 2020 Filing 1 EMERGENCY PETITION/MOTION for Compassionate Release,filed by Liza Robles.(lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/12/2020.]
May 8, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Memorandum and Order mailed to Petitioner (lp) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 5/12/2020.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robles v. Warden/Superintendent of Federal Detention Center-Philadelphia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden/Superintendent of Federal Detention Center-Philadelphia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Liza Robles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?