MUHAMMAD v. MATRIX MEDICAL NETWORK
HAJAR MUHAMMAD |
MATRIX MEDICAL NETWORK |
2:2020cv02244 |
May 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
BERLE M SCHILLER |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATRIX MEDICAL NETWORK ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14287639.), filed by HAJAR MUHAMMAD.(BAIRD, GRAHAM) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by HAJAR MUHAMMAD. (lisad, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MUHAMMAD v. MATRIX MEDICAL NETWORK | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MATRIX MEDICAL NETWORK | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: HAJAR MUHAMMAD | |
Represented By: | GRAHAM F. BAIRD |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.