PLANK v. SAUL
| JAMES EDWARD PLANK |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 2:2020cv02507 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HENRY S PERKIN |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MOTION OR ORDER DIRECTING ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT filed by JAMES EDWARD PLANK.Memorandum of Law, proposed Order.(FRIEDMAN, F.)
|
|
Filing 6
Procedural Order 6/4/20 Entered and copies e-mailed. (dt)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF 6/4/20 THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONS. THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT. ETC. SIGNED BY JUDGE: HENRY S. PERKIN ON 6/4/20. 6/4/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED (DT) Modified on 6/4/2020 (dt, ).
|
|
Filing 4
Social Security Magistrate Consent by JAMES EDWARD PLANK.. (FRIEDMAN, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(JL )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JAMES EDWARD PLANK.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(FRIEDMAN, F.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by JAMES EDWARD PLANK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(FRIEDMAN, F.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
