Creative Photographers, Inc. v. Grind Mode Media, LLC
| Creative Photographers, Inc. |
| Grind Mode Media, LLC and Grind Mode Media, LLC doing business as LITVIRAL |
| 2:2020cv02557 |
| May 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| Property Rights: Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PLEADING #2 MAILED TO US COPYRIGHTS (JL ) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Andre Defrancesco re: served Summons in a Civil Action, Civil Complaint and associated initiating documents upon Kenyetta [last name withheld] by Hand Delivery on 06/18/2020 (DANCHUK, EMILY) |
| Summons Issued as to Grind Mode Media, LLC. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 6/1/20 (JL) |
| Filing 2 Copy of Form to Register of Copyrights. (fb) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Creative Photographers, Inc.. (fb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Grind Mode Media, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14323038.), filed by Creative Photographers, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Report on the filing of a Copyright Claim (AO121), #4 Designation Form Designation Form, #5 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form)(DANCHUK, EMILY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
