BRANDT v. JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC.
VINCE BRANDT |
JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC. |
2:2020cv02598 |
June 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
Civil Rights: Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County. (nd, ) |
Filing 11 PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY, WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, FILED BY VINCE BRANDT. (amas, ) |
Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REPLY, WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, FILED BY VINCE BRANDT. (amas, ) |
Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC.. (RAZOR, MORGAN) |
Filing 8 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF (DOC. NO. #7 ) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT SHALL FILE ITS PROPOSED REPLY BRIEF BY 7/10/20. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 7/6/20.7/6/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief filed by JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC... (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A (Proposed Reply Brief), #3 Certificate of Service)(RAZOR, MORGAN) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . REPLIES DUE BY 7/10/2020. (amas, ) |
Filing 6 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (RE: DOC. NO. #4 ), WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, FILED BY VINCE BRANDT. (amas, ) |
Filing 5 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TODISMISS WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by VINCE BRANDT. (jaa, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC..Memorandum of Law. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(RAZOR, MORGAN) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID J. WOOLF on behalf of JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC. with Certificate of Service(WOOLF, DAVID) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC..(RAZOR, MORGAN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14328986), filed by JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C, #2 Exhibit D, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Case Management Track Form, #5 Designation Form)(RAZOR, MORGAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BRANDT v. JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JONES LANG LaSALLE, INC. | |
Represented By: | MORGAN BROOKE RAZOR |
Represented By: | DAVID J. WOOLF |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: VINCE BRANDT | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.