CAIBY V. FERGUSON
Plaintiff: ANTHONY VONE CAIBY
Defendant: TAMMY FERGUSON
Case Number: 2:2020cv02674
Filed: June 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: WENDY BEETLESTONE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2020 COPY OF ORDER #9 MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF. (jpd, )
July 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDERED THAT CAIBYS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED BECAUSE HE HAS SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE AND $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF CAIBY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL REMIT $400 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ANY MONEY THAT CAIBY PAYS TOWARD THE FEES IS NOT REFUNDABLE, EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. IN THE EVENT CAIBY PAYS THE FEES, THE CLERK SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES UNTIL SO ORDERED, SO THAT THE COURT MAY SCREEN THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(A). IF CAIBY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/7/20.7/8/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(jpd, )
July 6, 2020 Paper #4 mailed to pro se plff. (kw, )
June 30, 2020 Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
June 29, 2020 Filing 8 Amended Complaint against TAMMY FERGUSON filed by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY.(mbh, )
June 29, 2020 Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY. (JL )
June 29, 2020 Filing 6 ANTHONY VONE CAIBY APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS..(JL )
June 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED THAT CAIBYS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED BECAUSE HE HAS SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE AND $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF CAIBY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL REMIT $400 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ANY MONEY THAT CAIBY PAYS TOWARD THE FEES IS NOT REFUNDABLE, EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. IN THE EVENT CAIBY PAYS THE FEES, THE CLERK SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES UNTIL SO ORDERED, SO THAT THE COURT MAY SCREEN THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(A). IF CAIBY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 6/16/20.6/16/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(jpd, )
June 4, 2020 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY. (bw, )
June 4, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against TAMMY FERGUSON, filed by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, )
June 4, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY..(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CAIBY V. FERGUSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTHONY VONE CAIBY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TAMMY FERGUSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?