CAIBY V. FERGUSON
ANTHONY VONE CAIBY |
TAMMY FERGUSON |
2:2020cv02674 |
June 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
COPY OF ORDER #9 MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF. (jpd, ) |
Filing 9 ORDERED THAT CAIBYS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED BECAUSE HE HAS SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE AND $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF CAIBY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL REMIT $400 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ANY MONEY THAT CAIBY PAYS TOWARD THE FEES IS NOT REFUNDABLE, EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. IN THE EVENT CAIBY PAYS THE FEES, THE CLERK SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES UNTIL SO ORDERED, SO THAT THE COURT MAY SCREEN THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(A). IF CAIBY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/7/20.7/8/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(jpd, ) |
Paper #4 mailed to pro se plff. (kw, ) |
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 8 Amended Complaint against TAMMY FERGUSON filed by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY.(mbh, ) |
Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY. (JL ) |
Filing 6 ANTHONY VONE CAIBY APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS..(JL ) |
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT CAIBYS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED BECAUSE HE HAS SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE AND $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF CAIBY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL REMIT $400 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ANY MONEY THAT CAIBY PAYS TOWARD THE FEES IS NOT REFUNDABLE, EVEN IF THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. IN THE EVENT CAIBY PAYS THE FEES, THE CLERK SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES UNTIL SO ORDERED, SO THAT THE COURT MAY SCREEN THE COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(A). IF CAIBY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 6/16/20.6/16/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(jpd, ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY. (bw, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against TAMMY FERGUSON, filed by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ANTHONY VONE CAIBY..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CAIBY V. FERGUSON | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ANTHONY VONE CAIBY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TAMMY FERGUSON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.