BROOKS v. CAPOZZA et al
| JAMES BROOKS |
| MARK CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF FAYETTE |
| 2:2020cv02885 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ELIZABETH T HEY |
| CHAD F KENNEY |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT, OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. BROOKS, CP-51-CR-0011224-2012, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 8/10/20. 8/10/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED WITH COPIES OF PETITION #1 ORDERS # 3,5, 6 AND DO DOCKET TO THE PHIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND COPY OF ORDER E-MAILED/FAXED TO THE CLERK OF C.C.P. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.(jpd, )
|
|
COPIES OF PETITION #1 ORDERS #3,5 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO PA-ATTY. GENERAL CRIMINAL DIVISION. (jpd)
|
|
COPIES OF PETITION #1 ORDERS # 3,5, 6 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO THE PHILA. DISTRICT ATTORNEY. (jpd, ) Modified on 8/10/2020 (afm, ).
|
|
DOCS 5 AND 6 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH T. HEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA AND THE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA-CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 8/7/20. 8/10/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED WITH COPIES OF PETITION #1 ORDERS #3,5 AND DOCKET TO PA-ATTY. GENERAL CRIMINAL DIVISION.(jpd)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PPE217458 (dmc, )
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, filed by PRO SE PETITIONER JAMES BROOKS. "ENVELOPE ATTACHED" (kw, )
|
|
Doc. #3 and blank copy of application for IFP mailed to pro se petitioner. (kw, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH BROOKS WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF BROOKS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY THE REQUIRED $5.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 7/9/20. 7/9/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND IFP FORM NOT MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JAMES BROOKS., MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT, EXHIBITS, ENVELOPE ATTACHED. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(rf, ) Modified on 6/17/2020 (rf, ). *NO FEE PAID. NO IFP*
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
