WILLIAMS v. SCI-FAYETTE et al
Case Number: 2:2020cv02979
Filed: May 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF JAMIR WILLIAMS' MOTION TO REOPEN THE JUDGMENT IS DISMISSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 10/26/22. 10/26/22 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(JL)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDERED: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOCUMENT 13) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOCUMENT 1) IS DENIED AND DISMISSED;A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE, IN THAT THE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SUBST ANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT NOR DEMONSTRATED REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD DEBATE THE CORRECTNESS OF THE PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF THIS RULING. SEE 28U.S.C. § 2253(C)(2); SLACK V. MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 5/18/2022. 5/20/2022 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. SCI-FAYETTE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?