ANDREWS
| WILLIAM ANDREWS |
| 2:2020cv03005 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARK A KEARNEY |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Order #2 mailed to pro se litigant (nd, )
|
| Original record transferred to the Middle District of Pennsylvania via Interdistrict transfer system. (tjd) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FORTHWITH TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE CLERK OF THE U.S.D.C. FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PA AND CLOSE THIS CASE IN THIS DISTRICT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/24/20. 6/24/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PARTY.(kw, )
|
| Filing 1 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, FILED BY WILLIAM ANDREWS. (NO IFP FILED, NO FEE PAID) (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 Case Management Track Form)(amas, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ANDREWS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: WILLIAM ANDREWS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
