Burgher v. GlaxoSmithKline plc et al
| David Burgher |
| GlaxoSmithKline plc, Glaxo Group Ltd and GlaxoSmithKline LLC |
| 2:2020cv03238 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. (afm, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 7/10/20. 7/13/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by David Burgher As To ALL CLAIMS(THOMAS, FRAZAR) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER OUTLINED HEREIN.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 7/6/2020. 7/6/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GlaxoSmithKline LLC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14393604), filed by GlaxoSmithKline LLC. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SACHSE, WILL) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2020: #3 Designation Form) (md, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2020: #4 Case Management Track Form) (md, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
