JANE DOE v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
JANE DOE |
"JANE DOE", ASSOCIATE "AGENT" (EX CONS AND CURRENT PAROLEE AKA ILLEGAL CI ASSOCIAT OF THE PARENTE FAMILY) "JOHN DOE", CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE RADIO, CAPTAIN AND RADIO DISPATCHER(S) "JANE/JOHN DOE" AND RADIO DISPATC, 22ND POLICE OFFICERS "JANE DOE", 22ND POLICE OFFICERS "JOHM DOE", PFD ADMINISTRATION PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT/MARSHAL OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE', "JOHN DOE", PENNSYLVANIA STATE PAROLE AGENTS "JOHN DOE", CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL SGRILLO, LIEUTENANT STEPHEN YALE, PALINTIFF FORMER SUPERVISOR L SGT MARABELLA CURRENTLY LIEUTENANT MARABELLA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT DISPATCHER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 911 DISPATCHER, PENNSYLVANIA STATE PAROLE AGENT "JANE DOE", PHILADELPHIA 22ND POLICE OFFICERS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE COMMISSIONER DANIELLE M. OUTLAW, "JOHN DOE' and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING |
2:2020cv03352 |
July 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOC # 3 ALONG WITH IN FORMA PAUPERIS PACKAGE SENT TO JANE DOE ON 7/23/20 (rf, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT IF DOE SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, SHE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $400 (THE $350 FILING FEE AND $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE DOE WITH AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER OF THIS CASE. DOE MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IF SHE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF DOE FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HER CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/21/20. 7/21/20 ENTERED. PRO SE PLAINTIFF NOT MAILED. IFP FORM NOT SENT. (va, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against "JANE DOE"(22ND/23RD POLICE DISTRICT), "JANE DOE" (NAMED AS NEIGHBOR ON FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT EXHIBIT F ATTACHED), "JOHN DOE', "JOHN DOE", 22ND POLICE OFFICERS "JANE DOE", 22ND POLICE OFFICERS "JOHM DOE", ASSOCIATE "AGENT" (EX CONS AND CURRENT PAROLEE AKA ILLEGAL CI ASSOCIAT OF THE PARENTE FAMILY) "JOHN DOE", CITY OF PHILADELPHIA((LAW DEPARTMENT)), CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 911 DISPATCHER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT DISPATCHER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE COMMISSIONER DANIELLE M. OUTLAW, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE RADIO, CAPTAIN AND RADIO DISPATCHER(S) "JANE/JOHN DOE" AND RADIO DISPATC, PALINTIFF FORMER SUPERVISOR L SGT MARABELLA CURRENTLY LIEUTENANT MARABELLA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE PAROLE AGENT "JANE DOE", PENNSYLVANIA STATE PAROLE AGENTS "JOHN DOE", PFD ADMINISTRATION PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT/MARSHAL OFFICE, PHILADELPHIA 22ND POLICE OFFICERS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE', MICHAEL SGRILLO, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEPHEN YALE, filed by JANE DOE. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.