Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania, State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of Arizona, State of Alabama, State of Mississippi, Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Island, GUAM, State of Delaware, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Nebraska, State of Maryland, State of Ohio, State of South Carolina, State of Oregon, State of Oklahoma, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, State of Rhode Island, State of Indiana, State of Louisiana, State of Maine, State of New Jersey, State of New York, State of Minnesota, State of Vermont, State of Nevada, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Tennessee, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Washington, State of Iowa, State of Wisconsin, State of Utah, State of Michigan, NEW HAMPSHIRE, State of West Virginia, COLUMBIA, State of Montana, State of Hawaii, State of Georgia, State of Florida, State of Connecticut, State of Alaska, State of Kansas, ARKANSAS, State of Idaho and U.S. Virgin Islands |
MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI, BAUSCH HEALTH US, LLC, LANNETT COMPANY, INC., Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., Inc Pfizer, Kurt Orlofski, SUN PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, INC., FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., TELIGENT INC., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., Walter Kaczmarek, LUPIN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Michael Perfetto, MALLINCKRODT LLC, Mitchell Blashinsky, AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, G&W LABORATORIES, INC., Armando Kellum, WOCKHARDT USA LLC, James Grauso, GREENSTONE LLC, MYLAN INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Erika Vogel-Baylor, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, AUROBINDO PHARMA U.S.A., INC., GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS INC, USA, PERRIGO NEW YORK INC., Douglas Boothe, SANDOZ INC, Ara Aprahamian and MALLINCKRODT INC |
2:2020cv03539 |
July 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CYNTHIA M RUFE |
Other Statutes: Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. § 1 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by HEATHER K. MCDEVITT on behalf of TELIGENT INC. with Certificate of Service(MCDEVITT, HEATHER) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by BRYAN DANIEL GANT on behalf of TELIGENT INC. with Certificate of Service(GANT, BRYAN) |
Filing 22 ORDER THAT THE STIPULATION IS APPROVED. THE DEADLINE TO MOVE, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS ADJOURNED UNTIL THE COURT ENTERS A CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER SETTING A SCHEDULE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 9/9/2020. 9/9/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE DOCKET NO. 1504 IN 16-MD-2724)(kp, ) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Waive Service and Extend the Deadline for Defendants to Respond to the States' June 10, 2020 Complaint by MYLAN INC, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(HOLT, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by JASMEET K. AHUJA on behalf of MYLAN INC, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC with Certificate of Service(AHUJA, JASMEET) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by ADAM K. LEVIN on behalf of MYLAN INC, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC with Certificate of Service(LEVIN, ADAM) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by BENJAMIN F. HOLT on behalf of MYLAN INC, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC with Certificate of Service(HOLT, BENJAMIN) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by LEONID SANDLAR on behalf of Douglas Boothe with Certificate of Service(SANDLAR, LEONID) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by GUY T. PETRILLO on behalf of Douglas Boothe with Certificate of Service(PETRILLO, GUY) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by ADAM S. LURIE on behalf of Michael Perfetto with Jury Demand and or Certificate of Service(LURIE, ADAM) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by NATHAN M. BUCHTER on behalf of LANNETT COMPANY, INC. with Certificate of Service(BUCHTER, NATHAN) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by RYAN THOMAS BECKER on behalf of LANNETT COMPANY, INC. with Certificate of Service(BECKER, RYAN) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by GERALD E. ARTH on behalf of LANNETT COMPANY, INC. with Certificate of Service(ARTH, GERALD) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by ELIZABETH S. FENTON on behalf of Mitchell Blashinsky with Certificate of Service(FENTON, ELIZABETH) |
Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of Connecticut; Case Number 3:20-cv-00802. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. Case transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Clerk of the Panel on 7/17/2020. (Oliver, T.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Oliver, T.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by W. Joseph Nielsen on behalf of State of Connecticut (Nielsen, W.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing fee received from Attorney General, State of Connecticut: $ 400.00, receipt number CTXH00017001 (Peterson, M) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Redacted Complaint filed by State of Connecticut, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Sealed Document: Unredacted Complaint filed by State of Connecticut, #6 Standing Protective Order, #3 MOTION to Seal filed by State of Connecticut Signed by Clerk on 06/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 6 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/10/2020.(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/10/2020.(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/9/2020. Discovery due by 12/10/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2021. Signed by Clerk on 06/10/2020.(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 6/11/2020 to edit text(Fazekas, J.). [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 3 MOTION to Seal Unredacted COMPLAINT by State of Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 2 Sealed Document: Unredacted COMPLAINT against ALL Defendants by State of Connecticut. (Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Filing 1 Redacted COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by State of Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fazekas, J.) [Transferred from Connecticut on 7/20/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.