BROOKINS v. WETZEL et al
Plaintiff: JOHN DAVID BROOKINS
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-20, KENNETH GOODMAN, TAMMY FERGUSON and JOHN WETZEL
Case Number: 2:2020cv03548
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOSEPH F LEESON
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2020 Filing fee: $ 100.00, receipt number PPE217474 (dmc, )
August 5, 2020 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by JOHN DAVID BROOKINS. (jpd, )
August 5, 2020 Filing 5 PLAINTIFF JOHN DAVID BROOKINS' MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS.(jpd, )
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF 7/31/20 THAT PLAINTIFF JOHN DAVID BROOKINS HAVING SUBMITTED A COMPLAINT TO THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, IT IS ORDERED THAT: IF BROOKINS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER EITHER PAY THE $400 FILING FEE OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH BROOKS WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT PRISONER IFP FORM BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACITON NUMBER. ETC. IF BROOKINS FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON JR ON 7/31/20. 7/31/20 ENTERED. (DT)(COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF)
July 29, 2020 Filing 3 EXHIBITS by JOHN DAVID BROOKINS.. (amas, )
July 21, 2020 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
July 17, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TAMMY FERGUSON, KENNETH GOODMAN, JOHN DOES 1-20, JOHN WETZEL, filed by JOHN DAVID BROOKINS. (NO FEE NO IFP) (Attachments: #1 CASE MANGEMENT, #2 DESIGNATION)(JL )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROOKINS v. WETZEL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KENNETH GOODMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TAMMY FERGUSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN WETZEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DAVID BROOKINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?