castaneda v. JOHN DOE(S)(1-3) et al
| Nancy castaneda |
| NUROTOCO OF MASSACHUSETTS INC doing business as ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES, CO. and JOHN DOE(S)(1-3) |
| 2:2020cv03692 |
| July 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JUAN R SANCHEZ |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (JL ) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by NUROTOCO OF MASSACHUSETTS INC.(STADELMAN, SEAN) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN A. SHEINEN on behalf of NUROTOCO OF MASSACHUSETTS INC with CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE(SHEINEN, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by SEAN T. STADELMAN on behalf of NUROTOCO OF MASSACHUSETTS INC with CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**(ATYY REFILED AT DOCUMENT #4 )**(STADELMAN, SEAN) Modified on 8/4/2020 (tjd). |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Chemed Corporation with Certificate of Service by NUROTOCO OF MASSACHUSETTS INC.(STADELMAN, SEAN) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NUROTOCO OF MASSACHUSETTS INC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14457166), filed by NUROTOCO OF MASSACHUSETTS INC.(STADELMAN, SEAN) |
| Case Eligible for Arbitration(lisad, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
