CLX LOGISTICS LLC v. VAN KAMPEN et al
| CLX LOGISTICS LLC |
| VAN KAMPEN GLOBALLOGISTICS AGENCY B.V., RAIMOND VAN KAMPEN and VAN KAMPEN GLOBAL LOGISTICS AGENCY B.V |
| 2:2020cv03780 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT PLANTIFFS' UNOPPOSED #2 MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/11/20.9/11/20 ENTERED & E-MAILED. (fdc)
|
| Filing 3 Proposed Order RE: Motion to Dismiss complaint filed by CLX LOGISTICS LLC.Court Order.(MATTIA, CARL) Modified on 9/11/2020 (nd, ). |
| Filing 2 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by CLX LOGISTICS LLC.Motion for Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice.(MATTIA, CARL) |
| Summons Issued as to RAIMOND VAN KAMPEN, VAN KAMPEN GLOBAL LOGISTICS AGENCY B.V. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 8/12/2020 (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14483223.), filed by CLX LOGISTICS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track form, #3 Designation Form Designation Form)(MATTIA, CARL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
