AMER v. POMPEO et al
| FIFI MOHAMED AMER |
| JONATHAN COHEN, CARL RISCH and MICHAEL R. POMPEO |
| 2:2020cv04152 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD A MCHUGH |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by LAUREN E. DEBRUICKER on behalf of JONATHAN COHEN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, CARL RISCH with Certificate of Service(DEBRUICKER, LAUREN) |
| Filing 3 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (va, ) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by FIFI MOHAMED AMER (CASAZZA, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Summons Issued as to JONATHAN COHEN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, CARL RISCH, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. E-mailed To: CHRISTOPHER M. CASAZZA, ESQ. on 8/25/2020 (dmc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Writ of Mandamus against JONATHAN COHEN, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, CARL RISCH ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14516584.), filed by FIFI MOHAMED AMER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form, #4 Exhibit Exhibit Index, #5 Exhibit Exhibit A, #6 Errata Exhibit B)(CASAZZA, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
