TAGGART v. NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
| KENNETH TAGGART |
| STOCK & GRIMES, LLP, PRESSLER WARSHAW AND FELT, LLP, NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP |
| 2:2020cv04261 |
| August 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD A MCHUGH |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO. #7 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/22/20.10/22/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE by NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. re #9 Response in Opposition to Motion Notice of Supplemental Authority (SUTTELL, BRITTANY) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand - joining opposition filed by New Century Financial Services, Inc. filed by PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP, PRESSLER WARSHAW AND FELT, LLP. (GRIMES, FRANCIS) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement and to strike filed by PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP, PRESSLER WARSHAW AND FELT, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(GRIMES, FRANCIS) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for More Definite Statement and to strike Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SUTTELL, BRITTANY) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand filed by NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SUTTELL, BRITTANY) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for More Definite Statement and to strike filed by KENNETH TAGGART.Brief, Certificate of Service.(THOMAS, JOSHUA) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand filed by KENNETH TAGGART.Brief,Certificate of Service.(THOMAS, JOSHUA) |
| Filing 6 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County. (fdc, ) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with affirmative defenses by PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP, PRESSLER WARSHAW AND FELT, LLP.(GRIMES, FRANCIS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by FRANCIS X. GRIMES on behalf of PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP, PRESSLER WARSHAW AND FELT, LLP (GRIMES, FRANCIS) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC..(SUTTELL, BRITTANY) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC..(SUTTELL, BRITTANY) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14531165), from the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County Case No. 2020-02920, filed by NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT, #2 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT A, #3 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT B, #4 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT C, #5 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT D, #6 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT E, #7 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT F, #8 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT G, #9 Exhibit STATE COURT COMPLAINT EXHIBIT H, #10 Exhibit Consent for Removal, #11 Exhibit Consent for Removal, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Case Management Track Form, #14 Designation Form)(SUTTELL, BRITTANY) Modified on 9/1/2020 (md, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
