GRAHAM v. OBERLANDER et al
SHAROD T. GRAHAM |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and D.B. OBERLANDER |
2:2020cv04321 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDWARD G SMITH |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1) IS GRANTED AND THE PETITIONER HAS LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT DECLINES TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/9/20. 9/9/20 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER). (er, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/9/20. 9/9/20 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER) (er, ) |
PLEADING #4, #5 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SHAROD T. GRAHAM. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by SHAROD T. GRAHAM..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.