MUIR v. WETZEL et al
| JOEL MUIR |
| MR. J. HALL, JANE DOES, MR. S. SWARY, MR. B.A. GRAY, MR. M. SOMPEL, JOHN DOES, MR. D.K. SMITH, MR. J. BLUME, MR. R. WILLIAMS, III, MR. N. MACCAIN, KELLY LONG, MR. C. FOREMAN, JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. FREEMAN and MR. W.L. JAMES |
| 2:2020cv04459 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL RESEND MUIR A COPY OF THE COURTS SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 ORDER (ECF NO. #3 AND BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF MUIR SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE SHALL, WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $400 (THE $350 FILING FEE AND $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE) TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. MUIRS MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF NO. #5 IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS PREMATURE. IF MUIR FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/2/20. 11/2/20 ENTERED AND COPIES OF ORDER AND FORMS NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(jpd, )
|
| DOC. 3, 6 AND IFP FORM MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, ) Modified on 11/3/2020 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 5 PETITIONER JOEL MUIR'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL.(jpd, ) Modified on 11/3/2020 (rv). |
| COPY OF ORDER #4 MAILED TO PRO SE (jpd, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COURTS PROCEDURE FOR ASSIGNMENT OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO CERTAIN DISTRICT COURT JUDGES ON A ROTATING BASIS, IT IS HEREBY, ORDERED THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. LLORET. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 9/16/2020. 9/16/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, )
|
| COPY OF ORDER #3 AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORMS MAILED TO PLAINTIFF. (jpd, ) Modified on 9/17/2020 (lisad, ). |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT IF MUIR SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $400 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF MUIR IS ULTIMATELY GRANTED LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, HE WILL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY THE FILING FEE IN INSTALLMENTS, EVEN IF HIS CASE IS DISMISSED. HE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO THE RETURN OF ANY PAYMENTS MADE TOWARD THE FEE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH MUIR WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 9/15/2020. 9/16/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED WITH IFP FORM.(sg, )
|
| MAILED OUT PRO SE GUIDELINES ON 9/14/20. (jaa, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. BLUME, C. FOREMAN, J. FREEMAN, B.A. GRAY, J. HALL, W.L. JAMES, JANE DOES, JOHN DOES, KELLY LONG, N. MACCAIN, D.K. SMITH, M. SOMPEL, S. SWARY, JOHN E. WETZEL, R. WILLIAMS, III, filed by JOEL MUIR. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
