KORNAFEL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
Case Number: 2:2020cv04503
Filed: September 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT KORNAFEL IS ENJOINED FROM FILING ANY CIVIL ACTIONS CONCERNING THE IDENTICAL, UNTIMELY ALLEGATIONS HE HAS RAISED IN THIS CASE AS WELL AS 19-2292, 99-4916, 00-3250, 96-7436, AND 95-6670; NAMELY THAT THE LITIGATION AND SETTLEME NT OF A MARCH 11, 1992 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT INVOLVING A POSTAL SERVICE VEHICLE RESULTED IN AN ABUSE OF PROCESS, DECEIT, BIAS, AND OTHER IRREGULARITIES. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT DOCKET ANY NEW CASE FILED BY KORNAFEL THAT RAISES ANY CLAIMS COVERE D BY THIS INJUNCTION. IF KORNAFEL SUBMITS ANY NEW CASES TO THIS COURT THAT ARE COVERED BY THIS INJUNCTION, THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO RETURN THOSE PAPERS TO KORNAFEL ALONG WITH A COPY OF THIS ORDER. IF KORNAFEL SUBMITS A NEW COMPLAINT THAT IN ONLY PARTIALLY COVERED BY THIS INJUNCTION, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL RETURN THE FILING TO KORNAFEL WITHOUT DOCKETING IT. IN SUCH A CASE, KORNAFEL MAY RESUBMIT THE FILING FOR DOCKETING SO LONG AS IT ONLY RAISES CLAIMS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THIS INJUNCTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 10/5/20. 10/5/20 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO KORNAFEL. (fdc)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED; THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS MALICIOUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B)(I) FOR THE REASONS DISCUSSED IN THE COURTS MEMORANDUM; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE; NO LATER THAN FOU RTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF THIS ORDER, KORNAFEL SHALL SHOW CAUSE BY FILING A RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER NOT TO EXCEED TEN PAGES STATING WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT ENJOIN HIM FROM FILING ANY MORE CIVIL ACTIONS CONCERNING THE IDENTICAL, UNTIMELY ALLEGATIONS HE HAS RAISED IN THIS CASE AS WELL AS KORNAFEL V. U.S. POSTAL SERV., CIV. A. NO. 19-2292; KORNAFEL V. U.S. POSTAL SERV., CIV. A. NO. 99-6416; KORNAFEL V. UNITED STATES, CIV. A. NO. 00-3250; KORNAFEL V. U.S. GOVERNMENT, CIV. A. N O. 96-7436; AND KORNAFEL V. U.S. GOVERNMENT, CIV. A. NO. 95-6670; NAMELY THAT THE LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENT OF A MARCH 11, 1992 MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT INVOLVING A POSTAL SERVICE VEHICLE RESULTED IN AN ABUSE OF PROCESS, DECEIT, BIAS, AND OTHER IRREGUL ARITIES AND SHOULD KORNAFEL FAIL TO FILE A RESPONSE AS DIRECTED BY PARAGRAPH 4, THE COURT SHALL WITHOUT ANY FURTHER NOTICE ENTER AN ORDER ENJOINING KORNAFEL FROM FILING ANY FUTURE SIMILAR LAWSUITS WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION OF THE COURT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 9/18/20. 9/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PLAINTIFF.(jaa, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KORNAFEL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?