PARKS v. CAPOZZA et al
Petitioner: EVANS PARKS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MARK CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Case Number: 2:2020cv04532
Filed: September 14, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH T HEY
Referring Judge: JOEL H SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order COPY OF ORDER #6 MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER (jpd, )
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254. AS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. 3771(B)(2), THE COMMONWEALTH IS FURTHER ORDERED TO ENSURE THAT IN A FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF A STATE CONVICTION, ANY CRIME VICTIMS ARE AFFORDED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CRIMES VICTIMS ACT, AS AMENDED JULY 27, 2006 AND THE PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT, OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. PARKS, CP-51-CR-0003280-2016, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 10/28/20. 10/28/20 ENTERED AND COPIES FAXED/E-MAILED TO CLERK OF COURT PHILADELPHIA COUNTY AND NOT MAILED TO PETITIONER.(jaa, )
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH T. HEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'SOFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL - CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION.SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 10/28/20. 10/28/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO PA. ATTY GEN CRIM LAW-DIV(jpd, )
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Petition #1 Letter #4 Order #5 and Docket e-mailed to Pa Atty. Gen. Crim-La Div (jpd, )
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order COPY OF PETITION #1; ORDER #6 AND DOCKET SHEET E-MAILED TO DA PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. (jaa, ) Modified on 10/28/2020 (jaa, ).
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PPE220335 (dmc, )
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter dated 10/21/2020 by EVANS PARKS (sg, )
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order DOC. 3 MAILED TO PRO SE WITH IFP APPLICATION. (sg, )
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PARKS WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF PARKS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISON ASSETS SIGNED BY A PRISON OFFICIAL, TO THE CLERK OF COURT. IF PARKS FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/24/20. 9/24/20 ENTERED AND COPIES OF ORDER AND FORMS NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order DOC # 2 (PRO SE GUIDELINES) MAILED TO PARKS ON 9/17/20 (rf, )
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
September 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by EVANS PARKS.(NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) Modified on 9/16/2020 (md, ). (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/17/2020) (ke, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PARKS v. CAPOZZA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MARK CAPOZZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EVANS PARKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?