STOKES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Petitioner: JACQUAR STOKES
Respondent: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISSIONER OF PHILADELPHIA OF PRISON DEPARTMENT and BLANCHE CARNEY
Case Number: 2:2020cv04703
Filed: September 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: GERALD A MCHUGH
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2020 Filing 5 APPLICATION FOR PRISONERS TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by JACQUAR STOKES.(jaa, )
November 16, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by JACQUAR STOKES.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(jaa, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/17/2020) (jaa, ).
October 28, 2020 COPY OF ORDER #3 AND IFP APPLICATION MAILED TO PRO SE (jpd, )
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH STOKES WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF STOKES SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISON ASSETS SIGNED BY A PRISON OFFICIAL, TO THE CLERK OF COURT. IF STOKES FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/27/20. 10/27/20 ENTERED AND COPIES OF OPRDER AND FORMS NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(jpd, )
September 30, 2020 Copy of Notice of Pro Se Guidelines #2 mailed to Stokes. (fdc)
September 28, 2020 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
September 28, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JACQUAR STOKES. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/30/2020) (nd, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STOKES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF PHILADELPHIA OF PRISON DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BLANCHE CARNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JACQUAR STOKES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?