GOFTON et al v. KFORCE, INC.
Plaintiff: ADAM KIMBREL and HOPE GOFTON
Defendant: KFORCE, INC.
Case Number: 2:2020cv04886
Filed: October 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: PAUL S DIAMOND
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2020 Filing 17 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of John T. DiNapoli, Esq. by KFORCE, INC... (Attachments: #1 Sponsor's Statement, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(OSLICK, JACOB)
November 25, 2020 Filing 16 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Daniel I. Small, Esq. by KFORCE, INC... (Attachments: #1 Sponsor's Statement, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(OSLICK, JACOB)
November 25, 2020 Filing 15 APPLICATION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gina R. Merrill, Esq. by KFORCE, INC... (Attachments: #1 Sponsor's Statement, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(OSLICK, JACOB)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER THAT THE PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT SHALL FILE ITS ANSWER BY 12/3/2020.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/27/20.10/27/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
October 27, 2020 Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Attorney) filed by KFORCE, INC..Declaration. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Stipulation)(OSLICK, JACOB)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF KELLY A. BURGY, ESQUIRE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/21/20.10/22/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF BENJAMIN L. DAVIS, III, ESQUIRE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/21/20.10/22/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF MAUREEN A. SALAS, ESQUIRE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/21/20.10/22/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF DOUGLAS M. WERMAN, ESQUIRE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/21/20.10/22/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
October 19, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Kelly A. Burgy, Esq ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-14648974.) filed by HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL..(GOTTESFELD, MARK)
October 19, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Benjamin L. Davis, III ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-14648948.) filed by HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL..(GOTTESFELD, MARK)
October 19, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Maureen A. Salas, Esq. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-14648897.) filed by HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL..(GOTTESFELD, MARK)
October 19, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Douglas M. Werman, Esq. ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-14648895.) filed by HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL..(GOTTESFELD, MARK)
October 19, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK J. GOTTESFELD on behalf of HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL (GOTTESFELD, MARK)
October 15, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE by HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL of Consent of FELIPE RESTREPO to Join the Action Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. sec. 216(b) (WINEBRAKE, PETER)
October 13, 2020 Filing 2 STANDING ORDER OUTLINED HEREIN.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/13/2020. 10/13/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
October 5, 2020 Summons Issued as to KFORCE, INC.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 10/5/2020 (bw, )
October 2, 2020 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL. (fb)
October 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KFORCE, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14611684.), filed by HOPE GOFTON, ADAM KIMBREL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(WINEBRAKE, PETER)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GOFTON et al v. KFORCE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ADAM KIMBREL
Represented By: PETER D. WINEBRAKE
Represented By: MARK J. GOTTESFELD
Represented By: MAUREEN A. SALAS
Represented By: DOUGLAS M. WERMAN
Represented By: BENJAMIN L. DAVIS, III
Represented By: KELLY A. BURGY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HOPE GOFTON
Represented By: PETER D. WINEBRAKE
Represented By: MARK J. GOTTESFELD
Represented By: MAUREEN A. SALAS
Represented By: DOUGLAS M. WERMAN
Represented By: BENJAMIN L. DAVIS, III
Represented By: KELLY A. BURGY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KFORCE, INC.
Represented By: JACOB OSLICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?