Mekuns v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
| Crystal Mekuns |
| CHATTEM, INC., SANOFI US SERVICES INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE |
| 2:2020cv05000 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD A MCHUGH |
| P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Original record transferred to the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA via interdistrict transfer system. (lvj, ) |
| Filing 2 Certified Copy of Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-40). Re: Order that, pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 USC sec. 1407 to the Southern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of February 6, 2020, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Hon. Robin L. Rosenberg. (fdc) |
| Summons Issued as to BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, CHATTEM, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SANOFI US SERVICES INC.. Forwarded To: STEVEN B. BARRETT on 10/13/20. (fdc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14626743.), filed by Crystal Mekuns. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(BARRETT, STEVEN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
