ROBINSON v. SAUL
| TENNILLE MARIE ROBINSON |
| Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 2:2020cv05032 |
| October 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ELIZABETH T HEY |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Social Security Magistrate Consent by TENNILLE MARIE ROBINSON.. (CHERMOL, DAVID)
|
|
Filing 5
Supplemental Procedural Order 10/13/20 Entered and copies e-mailed. (va, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED AND THE CLERK SHALL ISSUE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 10/13/20. 10/13/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
|
Filing 3
Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(sg, )
|
|
Summons issued electronically as to Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to Acceptance of Service Agreement dated July 6, 2020. (va, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by TENNILLE MARIE ROBINSON..(CHERMOL, DAVID)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by TENNILLE MARIE ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(CHERMOL, DAVID)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
