BEY v. WOELPPER et al
| RESHAN SAVAGE BEY |
| ADA KOLLEEN MCMULLEN, TRANSIT P/O ROONEY, TRANSIT P/O CAMBURN, ADA JAREK KRAJEWSKI, ADA REBEKAH E. LEDERER, JUDGE SCOTT DICLAUDIO, JUDGE MATTHEW S. WOLF, JUDGE DONNA M. WOELPPER and ADA JORDON FOLEY |
| 2:2020cv05103 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| RICHARD A LLORET |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA SHALL FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 18, 2020. IF SUCH A MOTION IS NOT APPROPRIATE, WITHIN THE SAME TIME PERIOD THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THIS ORDER EXPLAINING WHY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS INAPPROPRIATE IN THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MAGISTRATE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 11/18/20. 11/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. *NOT MAILED TO PETITIONER. (jaa, ) Modified on 11/18/2020 (jaa, ).
|
| COPY OF ORDER #8 MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER (jpd, ) |
| Filing 7 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Nunc Pro Tunc filed by CAMBURN, SCOTT DICLAUDIO, JORDON FOLEY, JAREK KRAJEWSKI, REBEKAH E. LEDERER, KOLLEEN MCMULLEN, ROONEY, DONNA M. WOELPPER, MATTHEW S. WOLF.Certificate Regarding Service.Motions referred to RICHARD A. LLORET.(PRESCOTT, EILEEN) |
| PLEADING #6 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL ) |
| Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: MOTIONS DUE BY 11/16/2020. (tjd) |
|
Filing 6
ORDERED THAT THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, SHALL FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS, UNDER MOORE, ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 16, 2020. IF SUCH A MOTION IS NOT APPROPRIATE, WITHIN THE SAME TIME PERIOD THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THIS ORDER EXPLAINING WHY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS INAPPROPRIATE IN THIS CASE. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S MOTION OR RESPONSE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 10 PAGES IN LENGTH. PETITIONER MAY FILE A RESPONSE TO THIS ORDER ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 9, 2020. THE RESPONSE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 10 PAGES IN LENGTH.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 11/2/20. 11/2/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (jpd, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. LLORET, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL - CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 10/29/20. Motions referred to RICHARD A. LLORET.10/29/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SEPETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO PA. ATTY. GEN. CRIMINAL LAW-DIV. (jpd, )
|
| PETITION #2 REFERRAL ORDER #5 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO PA. ATTY GEN CRIM LAW DIVISION. (jpd, ) |
| PRO SE GUIDELINES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd, ) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by RESHAN SAVAGE BEY. (bw, ) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RESHAN SAVAGE BEY. (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by RESHAN SAVAGE BEY..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
