PERRONG v. PULSE OPINION RESEARCH, LLC
Defendant: PULSE OPINION RESEARCH, LLC
Lead Plaintiff: ANDREW PERRONG
Case Number: 2:2020cv05284
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against PULSE OPINION RESEARCH, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14659722.), filed by ANDREW PERRONG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(KELLEY, GREGORY)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PERRONG v. PULSE OPINION RESEARCH, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Lead plaintiff: ANDREW PERRONG
Represented By: GREGORY CLINTON KELLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PULSE OPINION RESEARCH, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?