ROBINSON v. BANNING et al
| RUSSELL ROBINSON |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN/JANE DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-15 and PATRICK BANNING |
| 2:2020cv05442 |
| October 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Plaintiff's Complaint filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.Memorandum and Certificate of Service.(JANKOWSKI, JENNA) |
| Filing 3 Patrick Banning's ANSWER to Complaint together with No by PATRICK BANNING.(JANKOWSKI, JENNA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RUSSELL ROBINSON re: Hope Cornish served Summons and Complaint upon PATRICK BANNING, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA by Electronic to Designated Receiptent. PATRICK BANNING served on 11/9/2020, answer due 11/30/2020; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA served on 11/9/2020, answer due 11/30/2020. (CORNISH, DAVID) |
| Summons Issued as to PATRICK BANNING, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 11/2/2020 (bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by RUSSELL ROBINSON. (md, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Civil Rights Violations against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14680557.), filed by RUSSELL ROBINSON.(CORNISH, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
