WILLIAMS v. SUPERINTENDENT SCI et al
JAMIR WILLIAMS |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT SCI and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE |
2:2020cv05506 |
November 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH WILLIAMS WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (SHORT FORM) BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF WILLIAMS SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR (2) COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, INCLUDING THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATION OF PRISON ASSETS SIGNED BY A PRISON OFFICIAL, TO THE CLERK OF COURT. IF WILLIAMS FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/8/20. 12/8/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(jpd, ) |
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #3 WITH IFP FORM TO PETITIONER ON 12/8/20. (jaa, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED), filed by JAMIR WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.