DAVE v. PATEL et al
ADVHOOT DAVE and AVDHOOT DAVE |
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (USPS) and SHIRIN H PATEL |
2:2020cv05548 |
November 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KAREN S MARSTON |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2679 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Amended ANSWER to Complaint together with With Affirmative Defenses , CROSSCLAIM against UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (USPS) by SHIRIN H PATEL.(LAYNE, JAMES) |
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #4 ON 11/16/20. (jaa, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC. NO. #2 ) IS GRANTED. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SHALL ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 1/12/21. SIGNED BY HONORABLE KAREN S. MARSTON ON 11/13/20.11/16/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE; E-MAILED.(amas, ) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint With Affirmative Defenses by SHIRIN H PATEL.(LAYNE, JAMES) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) filed by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (USPS).Certificate of Counsel; Certificate of Service.(DEGNAN, DAVID) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (USPS) from Commonwealth of PA County of Bucks, case number MJ-07101-cv-2552-2020., filed by UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (USPS). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form, #4 Complaint (State Court))(DEGNAN, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.