GUERRIOS v. GARMAN et al
| JOSE GUERRIOS |
| MARK C. GARMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY JOSH SHAPIRO |
| 2:2020cv05766 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Document #3 mailed to pro se petitioner. (kw, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER THAT CONTRARY TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 9.3(b) AND RULE 2 OF THE RULES GOVERNING SEC. 2254 CASES IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURTS, GUERRIOS DID NOT USE THE CURRENT STANDARD 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254 FORM REQUIRED BY THIS COURT, ETC. IF GUERRIOS INTENDS TO PURSUE THIS MATTER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254, HE SHALL SUBMIT A NOTICE TO THIS COURT STATING THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WITH THE CURRENT LITIGATION WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 12/3/20. 12/3/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(kw, )
|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number PPE221282 (dmc, ) |
| DOC. 2 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOSE GUERRIOS. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
