FINK v. PAUL DAVIS RESTORATION
KAYLA FINK |
PAUL DAVIS RESTORATION |
2:2020cv06081 |
December 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PAUL DAVIS RESTORATION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14753260.), filed by KAYLA FINK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(MANNING, SARAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FINK v. PAUL DAVIS RESTORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PAUL DAVIS RESTORATION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KAYLA FINK | |
Represented By: | SARAH E. MANNING |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.