WARIDI v. DADAY
Plaintiff: ZENOBIA WARIDI
Defendant: ROBERT P. DADAY A PUBLIC CORPORATION doing business as ACTING AGENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CHELTENHAM
Case Number: 2:2020cv06083
Filed: November 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MICHAEL M BAYLSON
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2020 Document #2 mailed to pro se plff. (kw, )
November 24, 2020 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
November 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT P. DADAY, filed by ZENOBIA WARIDI. ( NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WARIDI v. DADAY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ZENOBIA WARIDI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT P. DADAY A PUBLIC CORPORATION doing business as ACTING AGENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF CHELTENHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?