MITCHELL v. OBERLANDER et al
Petitioner: RICHARD MITCHELL and RICHARD LEE MITCHELL
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Case Number: 2:2020cv06097
Filed: December 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN M GALLAGHER
Referring Judge: ELIZABETH T HEY
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDERED THAT THE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME #4 IS GRANTED. HABEAS COUNSEL SHALL FILE A MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON OR BEFORE APRIL 28, 2021. THE COURT WILL SCHEDULE FURTHER BRIEFING UPON RECEIPT OF THE MEMORANDUM.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 12/29/20.12/29/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jpd, )
December 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH T. HEY FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL-CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 12/24/20. 12/24/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
December 24, 2020 COPY OF PETITION (DOC. 1), ORDER (DOC. 5) AND DOCKET SHEET SENT TO PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL-CRIMINAL DIVISION (rf, )
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Memorandum of Law in Support of 2254 Petition and/or Stay - Unopposed filed by RICHARD MITCHELL..(BROWN, JEROME)
December 11, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JEROME M. BROWN on behalf of RICHARD MITCHELL (BROWN, JEROME)
December 3, 2020 PRO SE GUIDELINES MAILED TO MITCHELL ON 12/3/20 (rf, )
December 3, 2020 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number ppe221687 (rf, )
December 1, 2020 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, )
December 1, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RICHARD MITCHELL. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Designation Form, #2 ENVELOPE)(bw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MITCHELL v. OBERLANDER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RICHARD MITCHELL
Represented By: JEROME M. BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RICHARD LEE MITCHELL
Represented By: JEROME M. BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?