VAZQUEZ v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
| ELBA VAZQUEZ and ELBA N. VAZQUEZ |
| UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
| 2:2020cv06162 |
| December 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1362 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE HENRY S. PERKIN.. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 12/17/20. 12/18/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(va, )
|
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Unum Group, d/b/a Unum Group Corporation in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with Certificate of Service by UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.(HENEFER, E.) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA waiver sent on 12/11/2020, answer due 2/9/2021. (HENEFER, E.) |
| Summons Issued as to UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 12/9/2020 (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14763189.), filed by ELBA N. VAZQUEZ.(LOPEZ, LINDA) Modified on 12/9/2020 (md, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
