KRATZER v. POSTMATES, INC.
| MARK JON KRATZER |
| POSTMATES, INC. |
| 2:2020cv06348 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ANITA B BRODY |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER POSTMATES, INC. answer due 2/26/2021. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 2/9/21.2/9/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jwl, )
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by POSTMATES, INC..Certificate of Service.(SIMMONS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing: A RULE 16 CONFERENCE IS SET FOR 3/24/2021 AT 10:30 AM BEFORE HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY.(jwl, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by TODD ALAN EWAN on behalf of POSTMATES, INC.(EWAN, TODD) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM J. SIMMONS on behalf of POSTMATES, INC. with Certificate of Service(SIMMONS, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MARK JON KRATZER re: Michelle Guyton served Summons and Complaint upon POSTMATES, INC. by In Person Service. POSTMATES, INC. served on 12/21/2020, answer due 2/12/2021. (LODGE, HANS) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 1/20/21.1/20/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jwl, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Hans W. Lodge ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number 0313-14852421.) filed by MARK JON KRATZER.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Attorney Admission, Hans W. Lodge)(POLAKOFF, JACOB) |
|
Filing 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 1/12/21. 1/12/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jwl, )
|
| Filing 2 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by POSTMATES, INC.. (EWAN, TODD) Modified on 2/2/2021 (lvj, ).(FILED IN ERROR BY ATTORNEY; FORWARD TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL) |
| Summons Issued as to POSTMATES, INC.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 12/18/2020 (bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by MARK JON KRATZER. (JL ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against POSTMATES, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14790272.), filed by MARK JON KRATZER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(POLAKOFF, JACOB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KRATZER v. POSTMATES, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: POSTMATES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM J. SIMMONS |
| Represented By: | TODD ALAN EWAN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARK JON KRATZER | |
| Represented By: | JACOB M. POLAKOFF |
| Represented By: | HANS W. LODGE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
