SPRADLING v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
| CHARLES SPRADLING |
| MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC. |
| 2:2020cv06579 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CHARLES SPRADLING. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. waiver sent on 1/4/2021, answer due 3/5/2021. (FUNK, ADAM) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CHARLES SPRADLING. MERCK & CO., INC. waiver sent on 1/4/2021, answer due 3/5/2021. (FUNK, ADAM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO) |
| Summons Issued as to MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 1/4/2021 (bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CHARLES SPRADLING. (lisad, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14813797.), filed by CHARLES SPRADLING. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(FUNK, ADAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
