GRAZULIS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE, et al.
| FRANK J. GRAZULIS |
| Secretary of Correct JOHN WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE |
| 2:2021cv00003 |
| January 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDUARDO C ROBRENO |
| CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Exhibits K-M to #4 Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by FRANK J. GRAZULIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit L, #2 Exhibit M)(FEINSCHIL, JAY) Modified on 2/19/2021 (tjd). |
| Filing 7 Exhibits G-J to #4 Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by FRANK J. GRAZULIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit H, #2 Exhibit I, #3 Exhibit J)(FEINSCHIL, JAY) Modified on 2/19/2021 (tjd). |
| Filing 6 Exhibits D-F to #4 Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by FRANK J. GRAZULIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E, #2 Exhibit F)(FEINSCHIL, JAY) Modified on 2/19/2021 (tjd). |
| Filing 5 Exhibits A-C to #4 Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by FRANK J. GRAZULIS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C)(FEINSCHIL, JAY) Modified on 2/19/2021 (tjd). |
| Filing 4 Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition Under 28 U.S.C. filed by FRANK J. GRAZULIS.(FEINSCHIL, JAY) Modified on 2/19/2021 (tjd). |
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA IS ADDED AS A PARTY RESPONDENT AND THE CAPTION IS HEREBY SO AMENDED. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS WITHIN FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254. THE CLERK OF THE QUARTER SESSIONS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. GRAZULIS, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA, CP-51-CR-1054051-1990, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 2/24/2021.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS ON 1/25/21. 1/25/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND DA PHILA. COUNTY., CLERK OF C.C.P. PHILA. COUNTY (jpd, )
|
| PETITION #1 ORDER #3 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO DA PHILA COUNTY AND COPY OF ORDER #3 E-MAILED/FAXED TO CLERK C.C.P. PHILA COUNTY. (jpd, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL - CRIMINAL LAW DIVISION WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/13/21. 1/13/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND PA ATTY. GEN CRIM. LAW DIV.(jpd, )
|
| PETITION #1 REFERRAL ORDER #2 AND DOCKET E-MAILED TO PA. ATTY GEN. CRIM LAW DIV. (jpd, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0313-14814312.), filed by FRANK J. GRAZULIS.(FEINSCHIL, JAY) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/8/2021: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form) (tjd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
