SELENSKI v. CAPOZZA et al
| HUGO MARCUS SELENSKI |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK CAPOZZA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONROE |
| 2:2021cv00094 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER RE: TRANSFER OF CASE. (ems) |
| Filing Fee for HABEAS CORPUS by HUGO MARCUS SELENSKI. (Filing Fee $5,) (PPE222689) (JL ) |
| DOC. 3 MAILED TO PRO SE. (sg, ) |
| Original record transferred to the Middle District of Pennsylvania via interdistrict transfer system. (lisad, ) |
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER FORTHWITH THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/19/21. 1/19/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(jpd, )
|
| DOC 2 (PRO SE GUIDELINES) MAILED TO SELENSKI ON 1/14/21 (rf, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.), filed by HUGO MARCUS SELENSKI. (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
