INTEGRATED ACCESS CORPORATION v. CONOPCO, INC. et al
| INTEGRATED ACCESS CORPORATION |
| UNILEVER CANADA INC. and CONOPCO, INC. d/b/a/ Unilever Food Solutions |
| 2:2021cv00098 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS ARE GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME, UNTIL 4/15/21, TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 3/3/21. 3/3/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, )
|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by INTEGRATED ACCESS CORPORATION. CONOPCO, INC. waiver sent on 1/15/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (BURKHOLDER, DAVID) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by INTEGRATED ACCESS CORPORATION. UNILEVER CANADA INC. waiver sent on 1/15/2021, answer due 4/15/2021. (BURKHOLDER, DAVID) |
| Summons Issued as to CONOPCO, INC., UNILEVER CANADA INC.. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 1/11/21 (bw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14829746.), filed by INTEGRATED ACCESS CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Case Management Track Form)(BURKHOLDER, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
