Parshall v. ABELIOVICH et al
James Parshall |
ASA ABELIOVICH, PETER THOMPSON, FRANCOIS NADER, PREVAIL THERAPEUTICS, INC., RAN NUSSBAUM, WILLIAM H CARSON, CARL L. GORDON, MORGAN SHENG and TIMOTHY ADAMS |
2:2021cv00137 |
January 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Parshall (MANISKAS, RICHARD) |
Filing 2 ORDER THAT THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE; ETC.. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 1/12/21. 1/12/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FRANCOIS NADER, ASA ABELIOVICH, TIMOTHY ADAMS, WILLIAM H CARSON, CARL L. GORDON, RAN NUSSBAUM, PREVAIL THERAPEUTICS, INC., MORGAN SHENG, PETER THOMPSON ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14835616.), filed by James Parshall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(MANISKAS, RICHARD) Modified on 1/12/2021 (fb). |
Summons Issued as to FRANCOIS NADER, ASA ABELIOVICH, TIMOTHY ADAMS, WILLIAM H CARSON, CARL L. GORDON, RAN NUSSBAUM, PREVAIL THERAPEUTICS, INC., MORGAN SHENG, PETER THOMPSON. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 1/12/21 (JL ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by James Parshall. (fb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.