LEVINE v. PERPETUAL TRADING COMPANY et al
KAREN LEVINE |
PERPETUAL TRADING COMPANY and BENNY J JIANG |
2:2021cv00173 |
January 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by KAREN LEVINE. BENNY J JIANG waiver sent on 1/14/2021, answer due 3/15/2021; PERPETUAL TRADING COMPANY waiver sent on 1/14/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. (TABAKIN, BRAD) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by KAREN LEVINE (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, #2 Exhibit Ex. B)(TABAKIN, BRAD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by KELLY LYN RAYMOND on behalf of BENNY J JIANG, PERPETUAL TRADING COMPANY (RAYMOND, KELLY) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by BETH A. CARTER on behalf of BENNY J JIANG, PERPETUAL TRADING COMPANY (CARTER, BETH) |
Summons Issued as to BENNY J JIANG, PERPETUAL TRADING COMPANY. EMAILED To: COUNSEL on 1/14/21 (jaa, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by KAREN LEVINE. (tjd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BENNY J JIANG, PERPETUAL TRADING COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14841576.), filed by KAREN LEVINE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Coversheet, #2 Case Management Track Form Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form Designation Form)(TABAKIN, BRAD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.