GILYARD v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
| SADE M GILYARD |
| THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KEVIN ALLEN KELLY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
| 2:2021cv00785 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ANITA B BRODY |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Nicole Cummings re: served Summons and Civil Action Complaint upon Kevin Allen Kelly by Personal on 02/25/2021 (SAFFREN, KENNETH) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Nicole Cummings re: served Summons and Civil Action Complaint upon United States Postal Service by Personal on 02/25/2021 (SAFFREN, KENNETH) |
| Filing 2 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (amas, ) |
| Summons Issued as to KEVIN ALLEN KELLY, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Forwarded To: Counsel and U.S. Attorney's Office on 2/23/21. (kw, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KEVIN ALLEN KELLY, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14931130.), filed by SADE M GILYARD.(SAFFREN, KENNETH) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by SADE M GILYARD. (tjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.